B2B data infrastructure
The data layer your go-to-market stack is missing, not duplicating.
Verified company and contact data, continuously re-checked and delivered to your own storage. Feeds, clean-and-enrich APIs, and search — all sitting on one dataset, so records resolve instead of contradicting each other.
- Flat-rate on core data
- Per-outcome enrichment
- Provenance on every field
Illustrative record
every field carries its own source
- Company
- Northwind SystemsPrimary registry
- Employee band
- 201–5002 sources agree
- Role
- VP Revenue OperationsRe-verified 3 days ago
- Work email
- Verified · role-matchedAcceptance checked
Source, timestamp, and confidence on every field. A wrong value is a question you can answer.
Three layers, one dataset
Everything sits on the same records, so nothing contradicts anything else
Take all three or start with one. Identifiers resolve across every layer, so a company found in search is the same company you enrich and the same one in your feed.
How a record is made
Where a field came from, and when it was last checked
01
Collected from primary sources
Signals are taken from the places change is recorded first, rather than repurchased from upstream wholesalers.
02
Verified across independent sources
Each field is confirmed against more than one signal, so a single bad source does not become a record you send to.
03
Conflicts resolved and the resolution kept
Where sources disagree, the winner is decided programmatically and the decision is stored alongside the field.
04
Delivered with provenance attached
Every field carries its source, its timestamp, and a confidence score, so any value can be traced or challenged.
Why it holds up
Four reasons this behaves differently in production
Each of these is a property of the system, not a claim about it. Any one of them can be checked on your own records before you commit to anything wider.
One platform, not stitched vendors
Most stacks glue a feed provider to a verification service to a search tool, and pay an integration tax in both money and engineering time. Here the same dataset sits under all three, so records resolve across layers instead of contradicting each other.
Provenance on every field
Source, timestamp, and a confidence score travel with each piece of data. Any field can be traced back to where it came from and when it was last checked — so a bad record is a question you can answer, not a mystery.
Current by default
Re-verification runs on a rolling basis. Job changes, invalid addresses, and company updates are corrected as the cycle reaches them, and records that are still accurate get a fresh timestamp rather than being resold as new.
Primary sources, not resellers
Data is collected from primary signals and verified across independent sources, rather than repurchased from the same upstream wholesalers. Conflicts are resolved programmatically and the resolution is recorded.
Who it is for
Built for the teams who have to answer for the data
The same foundation serves three very different budgets. What changes is which layer you start with.
Before you ask
The questions that come up on the first call
Answered here so the conversation can start at the part that matters — your data, not our pitch.
Bring a slice of your own data and we will show you where it breaks
Start with the datasets you already run on. We will resolve them against the same identities our feeds use and show you what changes before anything wider is committed.